In an interview with Neil Cavuto yesterday, House Majority Whip James Clyburn attempted to downplay the strength of the U.S. economy by saying flippantly that African Americans were, “fully employed during slavery.” His decision to resort to this outlandish rhetoric shows that Democrats can’t attack the President’s economic success, which they know to be benefitting …

Democrats have a lot of experience with “pivots,” but after the failure of impeachment their plan to attack the President over the economy defies logic. Politico: “House Democrats Eye Post-Impeachment Pivot” It’s not possible to square that with the below snapshot of what the state of the economy looks like, how the American people feel …

In a presser w/ Chuck Schumer today, Speaker Pelosi repeated her well-worn line about a budget representing national values and then said that the budget “in terms of our legislative work, is the heart of the matter. It’s where it all begins.” If that’s the case, did she and her caucus abandon the “heart” of …

SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI: It’s appalling the things that he says and then you say to me, tearing up his falsehoods, “isn’t that the wrong message?” No, it isn’t. It’s just, I have tried to be gracious with him. I’m always dignified. I thought that was a very dignified act compared to my exuberance as some …

Last month, Liz Cheney called Speaker Pelosi an embarrassment and said she was “surprised,” she still had Democrat support. That support may, finally, be waning. Some House Democrats are now anonymously “grumbling” to the New York Times about the “tactical missteps,” the Speaker made over the course of impeachment that revealed her true motives for going down this road. It makes …

JAY SEKULOW: I believe that we’ve established overwhelmingly that both articles of impeachment fail to allege impeachable offenses and therefore both articles, one and two, must fail. This entire campaign of impeachment that started from the very first day that the President was inaugurated was a very partisan one and it should never happen again. For …

PATRICK PHILBIN: So why is it that there are all of these defects in the House managers’ case for impeachment? Why are they asserting principles like, “only the guilty would assert privileges”? That’s not part of our system of law. Why are they asserting that if the executive resists, the House has the sole power to …

KEN STARR: A question to be asked: Did the House Judiciary Committee rush to judgment in fashioning the articles of impeachment? Did it carefully gather the facts, assess the facts, before it concluded, “We need nothing more than the panel of very distinguished professors and the splendid presentations by both the majority counsel and the minority …

PAT CIPOLLONE: We’ve never been in a situation like this in our history. We have an impeachment that is purely partisan and political, it’s opposed by bipartisan members of the House, it does not even allege a violation of law. It is passed in an election year and we’re sitting here on the day that election …

JAY SEKULOW: For the sake of the Constitution, for the sake of the office of the President this body must stand as a steady bulwark against this reckless and dangerous proposition. It doesn’t just affect this President, it affects every man or woman who occupies that high office. So, as we said with the first article …