Natural Resources

Committee on Natural Resources

Rob Bishop

Panel Urges Passage of Locally Supported Land Bills to Promote Economic Development and Conservation


Today, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands held a legislative hearing on two bills to promote economic development, improve conservation and address targeted federal land management challenges.

H.R. 2423, the “Washington County, Utah, Public Lands Management Implementation Act,” (Rep. Chris Stewart, R-UT) fulfills a promise made to Washington County, after years of negotiations and compromises between local stakeholders in Utah, to designate the northern transportation route and utility corridors outlined under the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (OPLMA).

"The bill before the subcommittee addresses the most grievous omissions in the RMP and clarifies the intent of Congress," Rep. Stewart said. "This language reflects the compromises the County negotiated with the federal government to minimize impacts on the desert tortoise and to allow the City of St. George to grow sustainably."

The BLM hasn’t followed the letter or intent of the law, and they marginalized the needs of local communities as a result. This bill requires BLM to do what they should have done in the first place, and that’s to actually listen to people who know the area and balance conservation with the growing economic development needs of the county,Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) said.

The bill directs the Department of the Interior to fully implement the Washington County provisions of OPLMA by issuing any necessary rights-of-way for the northern transportation route and authorizing the development of additional utilities to keep up with the growing population of the City of St. George, one of the fastest growing metro regions in the nation.

 The story of Washington County is not about conflict,” Iverson stated. “It is a story about people who care very deeply for their environment who work together to find the right balance between protecting resources and enjoying them.”

H.R. 1107, the “Pershing County Economic Development and Conservation Act” (Rep. Mark Amodei, R-NV), codifies a bipartisan agreement between major stakeholders in Pershing County, Nevada to benefit conservation, improve public land management and promote economic development.

 “[I] cannot stress enough the broad-based, all-inclusive nature of the long process to achieve consensus in Pershing County in regard to the future management of our public lands,” Perish County Commissioner Robert McDougal stated. “Hunters, hikers, four wheelers, rangers, environmentalists, miners, prospectors, educators, business owners and many other citizens were part of our process.“ 

The bill consolidates checkerboard land previously identified for disposal, conveys land for mining and public purposes, creates new Wilderness Areas and releases certain Wilderness Study Areas, to benefit conservation, recreation and economic development in Pershing County.

Nevadans know how to come to the table in good faith and work together,” Shaaron Netherton, Executive Director of Friends of Nevada Wilderness, said. “Getting to this point was not easy. Everyone had to compromise, and no one got everything they wanted. But the end product of this give-and-take has broad support and advances all of our interests.”

Read More

Interior Official: Land Consolidation Program Failing Native Americans, Taxpayers


Today, the Subcommittee on Indian, Insular and Alaska Native Affairs held a hearing on the Department of the Interior’s  (DOI) Cobell Land Consolidation Program. The program authorizes DOI to purchase highly fractionated allotments and consolidate them in tribal ownership. After an expenditure of over $1 billion, it remains unclear that the program has greatly reduced Indian land fractionation.  

Indian land fractionation has been an enormous burden for the Department, and it has denied thousands of individual Indians any economic benefit from their lands,” Subcommittee Chairman Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) said.It’s fair to ask: what kind of progress has been made, and has the program been a success?

In many cases, a single tract of Indian land can be owned by dozens or hundreds of Indians. As generations of Indian owners die intestate, their heirs each own tiny, undivided interests often in multiple tracts. Consolidation into a single owner reduces the DOI’s burden in administering these lands and benefits Native Americans by increasing the potential for productively using these properties.

Acting Deputy Secretary of the Department of the Interior Jason Cason testified that the Obama administration-run program “has not been successful in materially reducing fractional interests” despite spending $1.3 billion dollars to date.

It seems obvious to me that this is not something that we can just spend our way out of, but rather requires a careful approach and additional planning,Rep. Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen (R-American Samoa) stated.  

Cason offered two options for the future of the program: either leaving the initial legislation in place and allowing the program to use the remaining funds to resolve a tiny portion of fractionation, or allow Interior to “leverage the reaming $586 million dollars to carefully target interests.” This would create a stream of revenue that could be put back into the program.

The program will end in 2022, but the funds will be depleted long before the sunset date. Without reform – administratively or legislatively – fractionation will continue to drain resources needed to meet DOI’s responsibilities to tribes across the country.

I view the Buy-Back Program as a once in a lifetime opportunity to meaningfully address fractional interests that plague tribal communities and their efforts towards sovereignty and self-determination,” Cason stated.[I]n my mind we are almost back where we started eight years later, just treading water.”

Click here to view full witness testimony.

Read More

Panel Reviews Bipartisan Bill to Create Federal Land Inventory


Today, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands held a legislative hearing on H.R. 2199 (Rep Cramer, R-ND), the “Federal Land Asset Inventory Reform Act of 2017” or the “FLAIR Act.”

The federal government owns an estimated 640 million acres of land, although, amazingly, the actual acreage number is not definitively known. The bipartisan FLAIR Act requires the Secretary of the Interior to develop and maintain a cadastre of Federal real property in a publicly available, graphically geo-enabled and searchable format.

“One of my great frustrations is the fact that although the federal government owns some 640 million acres of land it is such a bad landlord. [They don’t] take care of this land and can’t even provide a comprehensive list of its land holdings. GAO has warned for years of these forgotten and abandoned lands,” Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock (R-CA) said. “How can you manage land you don’t know or care that you even own?”

“‘You can’t manage what you can’t measure,’” MAPPS Executive Director John Palatiello stated.The fact is the Federal government does not know what it owns, where it owns it, what condition it is in [or] whether it is still in the public interest for the government to own it.”

Starting in 2003, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) began listing federal real property management on its High Risk List due to the likelihood of “fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement” and the need for reforms.

Despite the federal government's efforts to better address management and ownership challenges with federal lands, a 2016 GAO report found that a range of challenges in managing real property still exist due to a lack of reliable data, complex disposal processes and costly environmental requirements.

The FLAIR Act will improve transparency and promote greater efficiency and cost savings for federal land management and ownership.

Click here to view full witness testimony. 

Read More

Hearing Focuses on Bills to Protect Property Rights, Increase Federal Transparency


Today, the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans held a legislative hearing on two bills to increase federal transparency, safeguard private and state water rights, and provide certainty to water and power users.      

The “Water Rights Protection Act” discussion draft (Rep. Scott Tipton, R-CO) protects state water law and private property rights from future federal takings.

Private water rights holders should not live in fear of the federal government coming after them. Mr. Tipton’s bill is necessary to ensure that privately held water rights cannot be extracted by the federal government in the future as a condition to secure a federal permit,Subcommittee Chairman Doug Lamborn (R-CO) said.  

Over many decades, federal attempts to manipulate the federal permit, lease and land management process to circumvent long-established state water law and hijack privately-held water rights have sounded the alarm for all non-federal water users that rely on these water rights for their livelihood. The Water Rights Protection Act is commonsense legislation that provides certainty by upholding longstanding federal deference to state water law,Rep. Tipton stated.

Vice President of the Utah Farm Bureau Randy Parker discussed the water rights issues he sees on the ground everyday as the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) “systematically challeng[e] state sovereignty and historically held water rights on public lands.”

The ongoing protests, claims, coercion and even bullying by agents of the FS and the BLM has created and continues to cause considerable uncertainty for ranching families across the West,” Parker said.

Chris Treese, Manager for External Affairs at the Colorado River Water Conservation District, urged swift passage of the “Water Rights Protection Act” to avoid the inevitable downward spiral of litigation.

Unless the FS commits to respecting Western states’ individual water rights adjudication systems to accomplish its flow-related goals, the only sure outcome is contentious, lengthy and expensive litigation. This is a result in no one’s interest, including the environment,” Treese stated.

H.R. 2371 (Rep. Paul Gosar, R-AZ), the “Western Area Power Administration Transparency Act,” establishes a pilot project to increase the transparency of the Western Area Power Administration’s (WAPA) costs, rates, and other financial and operational dealings for utility ratepayers and taxpayers. Patrick Ledger, CEO of the Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, welcomed the transparency and accountability promoted by this bill in light of the recent trend of increased utility rates.

With better information broken down in key components – and with a historical perspective – customers can have a better dialogue with [WAPA],” Ledger said.This is perhaps the most fundamental benefit that the transparency legislation offers.”

Click here to view full witness testimony. 

Read More

Panel Calls for Active Management to Improve the Health of National Forests


Today, the Subcommittee on Federal Lands held an oversight hearing on “Seeking Better Management of America’s Overgrown, Fire-Prone National Forests.” Members and witnesses called for a paradigm shift in the way we manage the nation’s increasingly overgrown, disease infested and fire-prone federal forests and grasslands.

Our forests are dying […]Nationwide, the Forest Service reports it is accomplishing less than 20 percent of its post-fire reforestation needs,Subcommittee Chairman Tom McClintock said.The American people want our forests returned to health. They want the growing scourge of wildfire brought back under control. They want the destruction of mountain habitats by fire, disease and pestilence arrested and reversed. They want the prosperity of their forest communities restored.”

Approximately 60 to 80 million acres of national forest are at a high, to very high, risk of catastrophic wildfire. Data from the Forest Service indicates that thinning and prescribed burns reduce wildfire intensity and improve health, yet only a small fraction of high risk acres are being treated. 

The panel outlined how the current regulatory environment and constant threat of litigation has significantly decreased management activities, including restoration activities following wildfires.

[T]he myriad of environmental statutes, regulations, manuals, handbooks, letters of direction, and litigation make forest health and fuels reduction project development time consuming and costly,” stated Vice President of Public Resources at the California Forestry Association Steven Brink. “Many projects are stalled or stopped by litigation.

Due in part to a lack of active management, insect infestations are killing mature trees on millions of acres of federal forests and catastrophic wildfires are burning unnaturally hot and growing in number and size, with devastating impacts on the environment.

In California, delayed restoration activities have resulted in the continued decay of 102 million dead trees in Federal forests of the Sierra Nevadas. National forests in California, traditionally carbon consumers, are now net emitters in the region, Brink estimated.

James Cummins, Executive Director of Wildlife Mississippi, described the budgetary challenge of fighting wildfires as a “secondary issue that can be solved by promoting more management.”

“Without giving the agencies the ability to work more quickly and efficiently, we cannot put forest management on the ground quickly enough,” Cummins added.


Last Congress, the House passed H.R. 2647 (Rep. Bruce Westerman, R-AR), the Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2015. The bill provided immediate tools for the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to dramatically improve the health of federal forests and rangelands. Through streamlining administrative and legal obstacles, the legislation would have reduced project planning times and the cost of implementing forest management projects.

Click here to view full witness testimony. 

Read More

Panel: Optimizing Rigs-to-Reefs Program Benefits Marine Ecosystems, Coastal Economies


Today, the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources held a hearing on “Reviewing Recent State Successes with the Rigs to Reefs Program.” The panel focused on the environmental benefits of maintaining decommissioned oil and gas platforms as marine habitat and ways to optimize the program's use and benefits. 

"Since the program’s formal inception in 1984, over 500 platforms of artificial reef have been established and maintained, giving rise to a collection of marine species and supporting local commercial and recreational fishing industries," Subcommittee Chairman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) said. 

Dr. Greg Stunz’s, Professor and Endowed Chair for Fisheries and Ocean Health at the Heart Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies at Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, research finds flourishing ecosystems around decommissioned rigs repurposed as artificial reefs.

“[W]e observe higher densities of fish, faster growth or at least the same growth rate, and even similar reproductive output when compared to natural bottom,” Dr. Stunz stated. “[B]y all measures…  Rigs-to-Reefs are functioning equivalently or better, and contribute similarly on a per-capita basis as natural habitat.”

In addition to supporting marine habitat, these artificial reefs have become major recreational attractions, including the HI A389 production platform in the Gulf of Mexico, which is the most popular and photographed scuba diving location in the region. They also benefit commercial fishing industries, including shrimpers, who trawl up to a quarter mile from reef sites and report higher yields in those areas.

The Rigs-to-Reefs program is a win-win situation for all and puts older resource materials to good use. It is good for business, government and especially the environment,” Texas Parks and Wildlife Department’s Artificial Reef Program Leader Dale Shively stated.

Despite wide-ranging ecological and economic success and growing demand for innovative decommissioning solutions, the program’s permitting process can take years.

The current process involves multiple federal and state agencies, all with their own required internal review processes that must be completed,” Vice President of Drilling, Completions and Facilities at W & T Offshore, Inc. David Bump said.W & T has been waiting for approval for over three years on a single application.”

Click here to view full witness testimony. 

Read More

Bishop Statement on EPA’s Pebble Mine Announcement


Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced an agreement to allow the Pebble Mine project in southwest Alaska to proceed to regular permitting under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The proposed mineral development project was preemptively denied by the Obama administration outside of the traditional NEPA process.

Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) issued the following statement:

“Finally, this project can begin a transparent process of review that provides for public input, environmental analysis and fair shake at approval, not more arbitrary decisions and lawsuits. The Pebble project being unilaterally precluded from even beginning the NEPA process was emblematic of the reckless and abusive actions of EPA under the previous administration. I thank President Trump and Administrator Pruitt for efforts to establish a predictable federal permitting process which is fundamental to future growth and investment for Alaska and communities across the country.”

Read More

Bishop Statement on Senate Failure to Advance the CRA for the Methane Venting and Flaring Rule


Today, the Senate failed to advance H.J. Res. 36 by a vote of 49-51. The joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA) would repeal the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) rule on methane emissions from oil and gas operations on Federal and Indian land. Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) issued the following statement:

“The Senate was just one vote shy of disposing of a rule that will unnecessarily harm western economies, bankrupt countless small businesses and further diminish state budgets and critical school funding. This is a win for the radical environmental left and the ever-expanding and lawless federal regulatory establishment. The Committee looks forward to partnering with the Department of the Interior to address the most egregious and harmful provisions of this rule and mitigate the harm wrought upon our states.”

Read More

Letter: Bishop and Labrador Express Concerns Over Obama-Era Climate Change Programs at Interior


Today, Chairman Rob Bishop (R-UT) and Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chairman Raúl Labrador (R-ID) sent a letter to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke expressing concerns and requesting information on two climate change adaptation programs established within the Department of the Interior during the Obama administration.

The Climate Science Centers (CSCs), which are led by the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs), which are principally managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have both been identified as having insufficient internal controls, lacking transparency and potentially funding duplicative research.   

“Despite a significant federal investment of at least $149 million,  their effectiveness, management, and levels of oversight remain serious concerns to the Committee. Since their inception, the CSCs and LCCs have lacked necessary internal controls, failed to develop effective communication policies, and have put taxpayer dollars at risk by acting in contravention of guidelines issued by Interior and the Office of Management and Budget,” the letter states.  

“Most recently OIG issued a program evaluation in which it found that taxpayer dollars are further imperiled due to the fact that the ‘CSCs and LCCs had no formal process to coordinate the prevention of duplication in research grants...’ In its review, OIG found that the CSCs and LCCs lacked a written policy for coordination, and that the LCCs failed to adequately keep track of their projects in a centralized database that could be utilized and accessed program-wide.”

Click here to read the full letter. Read More

Panel: Hydropower Reforms Needed to Streamline Relicensing and Incentivize New Development


Today, the Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans held an oversight hearing on the costly and lengthy process to relicense hydropower and to explore opportunities for new development.

Navigating through the federal bureaucracy necessary to obtain the proper licensing to get these new hydropower projects running is extremely complex and cumbersome. The time and costs associated with obtaining or renewing hydropower licenses, coupled with mandatory conditions imposed by numerous federal agencies, has been a major road block to the affordability and growth of our nation’s hydropower infrastructure,” Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans Chairman Doug Lamborn (R-CO) said.

Within the next five years, almost a quarter of all non-federal hydropower will face relicensing. The relicensing process, however, can take up to a decade and cost millions of dollars according to President and CEO of Voith Hydro, Inc. Bob Gallo.

Untapped potential exists across the country, and at all types of facilities,” Gallo said.It can take 10 years or more to license or re-license a hydropower facility – longer than even a nuclear power reactor... The lack of a standard timeframe and a lead agency to keep all on task cause indefinite delays.”

Herbie Johnson, President of the National Hydropower Association, discussed how regulatory uncertainty associated with the relicensing process is holding back investment and expanded hydro development.

“[T]he rising cost and the continuing regulatory uncertainty of the relicensing process creates real doubt about the future of many projects,” Johnson said.By reducing regulatory risk, cost and uncertainty, hydro developers will be encourage, and indeed motivated, to invest in new projects, develop incremental capacity at existing dams, create new jobs, and increase the amount of clean, affordable and renewable hydropower in our country.”

Randy Howard, General Manager of the Northern California Power Agency, reiterated these concerns, calling the relicensing process “unnecessarily cumbersome and costly.” Howard added that burdensome regulatory obstacles persist through the duration of a facility’s lifetime, not just during licensing approval.  

The challenges faced by project licensees don’t end once the permit is issued. Project operations and maintenance require continued engagement with federal and state resource managers on water releases, fish measures and more,” Howard stated.

Last month, the Committee advanced a slate of infrastructure bills including Chairman Lamborn’s H.R. 1967, the “Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) Pumped Storage Hydropower Development Act,” which will clear up regulatory permitting confusion at existing BOR reservoirs.  

Click here to view full witness testimony.  Read More

5.23.17. IIANA. 2:00 PM.

2017-05-24 15:35:26

5.24.17. OI. 9:00 AM.

2017-05-24 14:18:54

5.23.17. FL. 10:00 AM.

2017-05-23 16:07:34

5.18.17. WPO. 10:00 AM.

2017-05-18 16:26:13

5.17.17. FL. 2:00 PM.

2017-05-17 20:10:29

5.17.17. EMR. 10:00 AM

2017-05-17 15:18:40

5.3.17. WPO. 2:30 PM.

2017-05-03 20:07:03

5.2.17. FL. 10:00 AM.

2017-05-02 17:08:13

4.27.17. FC. 10:00 AM.

2017-04-27 15:42:37

4.26.17. FC. 4:00 PM.

2017-04-26 20:46:24

Contact Information

1324 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
Phone 202-225-2761
Fax 202-225-5929


Rob Bishop


Recent Videos