Today, Rep. Paul Broun, M.D. (GA) posted a blog in The Hill declaring Judge Roger Vinson's ruling on ObamaCare "A Victory for Constitutionalism".

Read an excerpt here:

On Monday, Judge Roger Vinson declared the healthcare reform law entirely void. This victory for Constitutionalism was presented in a thorough, well-written brief citing the Founders’ intent in addition to the standard statements of precedent. One passage by Judge Vinson in particular struck me:
 
"This case is not about whether the [healthcare] Act is wise or unwise legislation... In fact, it is not really about our healthcare system at all. It is principally about our federalist system, and it raises very important issues regarding the Constitutional role of our federal government."
 
He makes a powerful distinction. Do I believe that this bill will be a bureaucratic nightmare, a cancerous financial drain, and a government-centered rather than patient-centered approach to healthcare? Absolutely.  However, like Judge Vinson states, this discussion is not about anyone’s opinion of this legislation. It is about the Constitutional constraints of federal power.

Read the rest HERE