Pelosi's Health Care Plan Facts and Details Round 3October 31, 2009We'll be updating you with new finds from the Pelosi health care bill this weekend so stay tuned! Here are some of our latest finds: -- Page 1793: There is a Davis-Bacon expansion in the Indian Health Service titles. Right now, Davis-Bacon applies only to facilities directly constructed by the IHS, but the language below would extend that to tribes who construct their own facilities under a self-determination contract. ‘(c) L ABOR STANDARDS.—For the purposes of im16 plementing the provisions of this title, contracts for the 17 construction or renovation of health care facilities, staff18 quarters, and sanitation facilities, and related support in19frastructure, funded in whole or in part with funds made 20 available pursuant to this title, shall contain a provision21 requiring compliance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of22 title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the23 ‘Davis-Bacon Act’).-- FYI: The Democrats cut nearly $55 billion from total spending on their new (mandatory) public health investment fund – not by reducing overall spending levels, but by deleting the spending amounts in the second five years. Instead of $88.7 billion in funding, CBO scored the bill as providing under $34 billion in funding. That presumes, of course, a program funded with $9 billion in mandatory spending in Fiscal Year 2015 will disappear entirely the next year. -- Page 1076: State Medicaid programs now required to cover juvenile inmates after their time in jail. States must retain coverage for juveniles enrolled in Medicaid “immediately before becoming an inmate of a public institution,” and maintain such coverage after the inmate’s release “unless and until there is a determination that the individual is no longer eligible to be so enrolled.” SEC. 1729. PRESERVING MEDICAID COVERAGE FOR 10 YOUTHS UPON RELEASE FROM PUBLIC INSTI11 TUTIONS. 12 Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 13 1396a), as amended by section 1631(b) and 1703(a), is 14 amended— 15 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 16 (74); 17 (2) by striking the period at the end of para18 graph (75) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 19 (3) by inserting after paragraph (75) the fol20 lowing new paragraph: 21 ‘‘(76) provide that in the case of any youth who 22 is 18 years of age or younger, was enrolled for med23 ical assistance under the State plan immediately be24 fore becoming an inmate of a public institution, is 25 18 years of age or younger upon release from such 1 institution, and is eligible for such medical assist2 ance under the State plan at the time of release 3 from such institution— 4 ‘‘(A) during the period such youth is incar5 cerated in a public institution, the State shall 6 not terminate eligibility for medical assistance 7 under the State plan for such youth; 8 ‘‘(B) during the period such youth is incar9 cerated in a public institution, the State shall 10 establish a process that ensures— 11 ‘‘(i) that the State does not claim fed12 eral financial participation for services that 13 are provided to such youth and that are 14 excluded under subsection 1905(a)(28)(A); 15 and 16 ‘‘(ii) that the youth receives medical 17 assistance for which federal participation is 18 available under this title; 19 ‘‘(C) on or before the date such youth is 20 released from such institution, the State shall 21 ensure that such youth is enrolled for medical 22 assistance under this title, unless and until 23 there is a determination that the individual is 24 no longer eligible to be so enrolled; and 1 ‘‘(D) the State shall ensure that enroll2 ment under subparagraph (C) will be completed 3 before such date so that the youth can access 4 medical assistance under this title immediately 5 upon leaving the institution.’’ -- Page 872: Includes language regulating the qualifications of the food services director at all nursing homes receiving reimbursement under Medicare and Medicaid. Language here: (a) MEDICARE.—Section 1819(b)(4)(A) of the Social 7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–3(b)(4)(A)) is amended by 8 adding at the end the following: ‘‘With respect to meeting 9 the staffing requirement imposed by the Secretary to carry 10 out clause (iv), the full-time director of food services of 11 the facility, if not a qualified dietitian (as defined in sec12 tion 483.35(a)(2) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, 13 as in effect as of the date of the enactment of this sen14 tence), shall be a Certified Dietary Manager meeting the 15 requirements of the Certifying Board for Dietary Man16 agers, or a Dietetic Technician, Registered meeting the 17 requirements of the Commission on Dietetic Registration 18 or have equivalent military, academic, or other qualifica19 tions (as specified by the Secretary).’’. -- Pages 502-520: Here, the bill sets up an Institute of Medicine study on “high-value” health care, and requires the Institute to recommend – and HHS to implement – changes to Medicare policy reflecting the report. Page 510 gives the Secretary blanket waiver authority to implement these changes, unless Congress passed a joint resolution of disapproval blocking them. Because the changes would go into effect unless Congress acts before May 2012, it would effectively require a 2/3 majority to enact a joint resolution of disapproval – since it’s highly unlikely a President Obama would sign a resolution undermining his Administration’s own work. Most troubling is the lack of anti-rationing provisions throughout this section. In other words, bureaucrats on the IOM and/or HHS could decide “high-value” health care means denying patients effective but expensive treatments, and put their policies into law – unless a 2/3 majority of both houses of Congress stopped them. (Remember too Obama’s own words on rationing in his NYT interview: “The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill out here….There is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place.”)
Page 57: The Democrats amended the reinsurance program, which provides $10 billion in federal funds to employers who cover their retirees age 55-64, to ensure that State/municipal health plans and multiemployer plans were eligible for funding. Those specific references were not in HR 3200. In other words, the Democrats want to make sure that AFSCME and the big multiemployer union plans get their share of the $10 billion in goodies being given away. -- Page 106: Durable medical equipment now added to the list of mandatory benefits in the coverage all Americans must buy. In other words, we're spending $1.3 trillion on health care so people can go around doing this. -- Page 216: The bill includes a new clause prohibiting a federal bailout of the government-run health plan (see below). Of course, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac weren't going to get a federal bailout -- until they did. Does anyone believe that a government-run plan which all experts agree would enroll millions of people would be allowed to fail? |
Search the Conference Blog
Blog Archive
Downloads
|






